- What happened?
- What was the relationship between Reproductive Medical Technology, Inc. (RMTI) and University of Utah Health Care Community Laboratory?
- What has the University of Utah Health Care done about this issue?
- Is this clinic continuing to operate?
- Why did you choose a special committee and outside expert to review this case?
- Have laboratory standards changed?
- How many patients were affected?
- What should a concerned patient do after learning about this incident?
- How will you keep patients informed?
- Where can I get more information?
- If I’m concerned and want my child tested, do I need his/her consent?
- I used or was conceived with anonymous donor sperm. I’d like information on my sperm donor. Where can I obtain this?
A: A woman shared concerns with us and the media, reporting that she and her husband received infertility treatment at the University of Utah Community Laboratory and Reproductive Medical Technologies, Inc. (RMTI) in the early 1990s. Recently, a genetic test revealed that contrary to what they had believed, her husband was not the biological father of the couple’s daughter, who was born in 1992. The family reported that the biological father has since been identified as Tom Lippert, a former medical technician of the two clinics who was responsible for preparing sperm samples. From the information that we have to date, we can not be certain as to what occurred. We sympathize with the anxiety this family has suffered and we understand that this information may raise concern for others.
Q: What was the relationship between Reproductive Medical Technology, Inc. (RMTI) and University of Utah Health Care Community Laboratory?
A. University of Utah Community Laboratory and RMTI began an affiliation in 1984 which ended when RMTI became defunct in 1998. Although the two laboratories were separate legal entities, we have now learned that in addition to being co-located, the labs shared administrative oversight and staff. Understandably, to many patients they might well have appeared to be one entity. This overlap has made it difficult to piece together who had oversight of various activities, and who was ultimately accountable. Both clinics employed Mr. Lippert.
A: When this issue was first raised, we took several immediate actions. First, we began looking for records associated with the case many of which are over two decades old. Second, we assembled a team of top medical professionals to review them. Third, we retained an independent third-party medical ethicist to review the methodology used by the committee and its findings and recommendations.
A: The RMTI facility is now defunct. It closed in 1998 when its founder passed away. The University’s Community Laboratory also closed approximately ten years ago.
A: The information currently available raises challenging medical and ethical issues. For this reason, we have assigned three physician leaders to review the facts and make findings and recommendations for moving forward. We have retained an outside medical ethicist to review the methodology, findings, and recommendations to ensure the integrity of the process.
A: Our policies and protocols today are very different than what was in place in these two labs, given the industry standard in the 80’s and early 90’s. In the laboratories and clinics where we handle patient specimens and treat infertility and other conditions today, we maintain strict protocols regarding identification and tissue handling. We meet rigorous national accreditation standards and perform internal compliance audits and reviews. We no longer maintain a donor sperm bank and rely instead on national banks. In addition, all our employees undergo careful screening and criminal background checks.
A: We estimate that these two labs could have provided various services to approximately 1,000 customers during the time period in question. However, not all of these services would have included sperm preps for artificial insemination. To date, we have no evidence to suggest this case extends beyond the one family in question.
We would encourage any patient with questions to call our hotline number, which is 801-587-5852. We have also launched a website with information and updates. Patients can also email us at firstname.lastname@example.org. We will continue to offer paternity testing for concerned patients who were in RMTI or the University of Utah’s care during the relevant time period.
A: Our patients are our primary focus. We have created a hotline number for patients who have questions about their care: 801-587-5852. In addition, we are posting information and updates on our website. Patients can also email us at email@example.com.
A: We have set up a hotline number for patients who have questions about their care. That number is 801-587-5852. In addition, we are posting information and updates on our website at www.communitylabfacts.org.
A: Individuals with questions can call 801-587-5852 for more information or to schedule a consultation. We will also continue to update this website with further information as it becomes available.
A: Yes. The University has contracted with the national laboratory TestMe DNA to conduct this testing on our behalf. Information about the company is available online at http://testmedna.com. The laboratory is not owned or affiliated with the University of Utah. Our contract with the laboratory requires that any paternity testing of individuals over 18 years of age be done with full consent of those being tested. We believe this requirement is appropriate and meets the important ethical responsibility we have to our patients.
Q: I used or was conceived with anonymous donor sperm. I’d like information on my sperm donor. Where can I obtain this?
A: Sperm donors donate under the expectation of maintaining their anonymity, which limits any information available sperm banks can disclose about them. Sperm banks typically provide profiles about the sperm donor during the selection process, but this would be the only information available regarding the sperm donor and his identity.